Preprint · Version 1.0Graph theory and discrete mathematicsPreprint; not peer reviewed

Line-graph inertia of roses and generalized theta graphs

Zenodo deposit
1 August 2026
Version
1.0
Authoritative archive
Zenodo

Abstract

For a graph G, the adjacency inertia of the line graph L(G) is determined by the number of eigenvalues of the signless Laplacian Q(G) above, equal to, and below 2. The manuscript computes the inertia of Q(G) − 2I, and hence the inertia of the adjacency matrix of L(G), exactly, including every singular case, for rose graphs and generalized theta graphs. Both computations follow from a common reduction: deleting the common vertices leaves disjoint paths, and range-kernel elimination leaves their singular kernel directions and a residual scalar for a rose graph, or a 2 by 2 matrix for a generalized theta graph. The resulting formulas depend only on the path lengths modulo 4. Consequences include the bound m_Q(G,2) ≤ c(G) for generalized theta graphs with at least three paths and an exact comparison with the conjectured bound 2s(L(G)) ≤ c(G) + 1, whose slack grows linearly with the cyclomatic number on both classes, with equality only for cycles whose length is congruent to 1 modulo 4. The general conjecture is not proved. A partial extension to bridgeless cacti is also given, and exact finite computations check every formula branch.

Key formulae

mQ(G,2)c(G)m_Q(G,2)\le c(G)

Document status

The manuscript is a non-peer-reviewed preprint. No journal acceptance or publication is claimed.

Main contributions

  • Exact inertia of Q(G) − 2I, and hence of A(L(G)), for rose graphs and generalized theta graphs, singular cases included.
  • One reduction serving both classes: deletion of the common vertices and range-kernel elimination on the remaining paths.
  • The bound m_Q(G,2) ≤ c(G) for generalized theta graphs with at least three paths, and the exact comparison with the conjectured bound 2s(L(G)) ≤ c(G) + 1.

Stated limitations

  • This is a non-peer-reviewed preprint; no acceptance or journal-publication status is claimed.
  • The conjecture 2s(L(G)) ≤ c(G) + 1 is not proved: the work compares it exactly on the two classes it treats.
  • The extension to bridgeless cacti is stated by the authors as partial.
  • The results concern rose graphs and generalized theta graphs; no extension to other families is claimed beyond the partial one above.

Versions and provenance

Public materials

Technical details
SHA-256
07ab8e063e316901b55d3b956b5a5543ded366b20a5a8601673d5a3795eb41ad
SHA-256 · Zenodo source and reproducibility package
2ef9675613593a4c4b10bf20749f9557aa42a3372896c3c27b83c1733c5b089b
SHA-256 · Aletheia edition (PDF)
505ff722296d7896ed4b40eff583ad48998cf351d370dd02b923ad7fe2950075
OpenTimestamps proof (.ots)
OpenTimestamps proof (.ots)

When this file existed

The proof of the date was requested on 1 August 2026 and is waiting for confirmation.

Citation

BibTeX
@misc{Paone2026LineGraphInertia,
  author = {Paone, Andrea and Paone, Marco},
  title = {Line-graph inertia of roses and generalized theta graphs},
  month = aug,
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-08-01},
  version = {1.0},
  doi = {10.5281/zenodo.21744051},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21744051},
  note = {Preprint; not peer reviewed}
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
AU  - Paone, Andrea
AU  - Paone, Marco
TI  - Line-graph inertia of roses and generalized theta graphs
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026-08-01
DB  - Zenodo
ET  - 1.0
DO  - 10.5281/zenodo.21744051
UR  - https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21744051
N1  - Preprint; not peer reviewed
KW  - rose graph
KW  - generalized theta graph
KW  - line graph
KW  - adjacency inertia
KW  - graph signature
KW  - signless Laplacian
KW  - generalized Schur complement
KW  - spectral graph theory
KW  - 2020 MSC 05C50
KW  - 2020 MSC 15A18
ER  -

Keywords